| Summary: | run-leaks should run leaks with --list (on Mojave) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Joseph Pecoraro <joepeck> | ||||
| Component: | Tools / Tests | Assignee: | Alexey Proskuryakov <ap> | ||||
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Normal | CC: | ap, ews-watchlist, glenn, joepeck, lforschler, lingcherd_ho, webkit-bug-importer | ||||
| Priority: | P2 | Keywords: | InRadar | ||||
| Version: | WebKit Nightly Build | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Joseph Pecoraro
2018-07-16 16:20:11 PDT
Also `parseLeaksOutput` in Tools/Scripts/run-leaks I don't think that parsing the new format is feasible without deep changes to LeaksViewer. Created attachment 348647 [details]
proposed patch
Hmm, I got 1.7 GB of memgraphs when running locally. We'll probably need custom aggressive pruning for leaks queue archives for this to be feasible. Comment on attachment 348647 [details] proposed patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=348647&action=review > Tools/ChangeLog:14 > + (runLeaks): Ad there is no way to test whether the new format is supported in advance, nit: Ad = Add? Committed http://trac.webkit.org/r235633 And r235634 for a "print" forgotten in run-leaks. Comment on attachment 348647 [details]
proposed patch
Nice!
|