Bug 92904
| Summary: | Rebaseline fast/box-sizing/box-sizing.html and compositing/overflow/clip-descendents.html | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Robert Hogan <robert> | 
| Component: | Tools / Tests | Assignee: | Nobody <webkit-unassigned> | 
| Status: | NEW | ||
| Severity: | Normal | CC: | dino, d-r, jamesr, lforschler, mikhail.pozdnyakov, naginenis, ossy, rakuco, robert, roger_fong, tmpsantos | 
| Priority: | P2 | Keywords: | LayoutTestFailure | 
| Version: | 528+ (Nightly build) | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
          Robert Hogan
          
          
          
          
        
        
      Rebaseline compositing/overflow/clip-descendents.html and fast/box-sizing/box-sizing.html after http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/124347
See bug 80219 and entries in the TestExpectations file
    | Attachments | ||
|---|---|---|
| Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc. | 
          Dean Jackson
          
          
          
          
        
        
      Mac expectations updated http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/125097
    
          Roger Fong
          
          
          
          
        
        
      Hello Robert,
I'm working on making the Windows test bots green.
Looks like this one will be easy to knock out but I don't just want to take whatever the current results are and set them as the new expected results because I'm not as familiar with the fix as you are.
I'd rather not add it to the skip list because it looks like something reasonable to actually try to get passing.
Can you go in and confirm that the expected results.
Results are here: 
http://build.webkit.org/results/Apple%20Win%207%20Release%20(Tests)/r124486%20(26176)/results.html
2nd line: clip-descendents
16th: box-sizing
Thanks a bunch
    
          Robert Hogan
          
          
          
          
        
        
      Yes, they look fine to me and are in line with the diffs I submitted for other ports - https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=155597&action=review
    
          Roger Fong
          
          
          
          
        
        
      Alright cool, 
I'll go ahead and rebaseline those then. 
thanks