81746 2012-03-21 00:50:25 -0700 REGRESSION (r111497): fast/css/text-transform-select.html and fast/forms/select/menulist-disabled-option.html is failing 2012-03-21 07:21:22 -0700 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit Layout and Rendering 528+ (Nightly build) Unspecified Unspecified RESOLVED FIXED InRadar, LayoutTestFailure, Regression P1 Normal --- 79764 1 mitz webkit-unassigned dglazkov keishi ossy pnormand shinyak tkent webkit-bug-importer yosin oldest_to_newest 583876 0 mitz 2012-03-21 00:50:25 -0700 After <http://trac.webkit.org/r111500>, text-transform is not applied to the popup button text in fast/css/text-transform-select.html. 583878 1 webkit-bug-importer 2012-03-21 00:50:53 -0700 <rdar://problem/11088942> 583881 2 mitz 2012-03-21 01:04:33 -0700 Updated the Mac expected results for this test in <http://trac.webkit.org/r111508>. 584053 3 ossy 2012-03-21 06:11:31 -0700 r111497 is the culprit, not r111500. - http://build.webkit.sed.hu/results/x86-64%20Linux%20Qt%20Release/r111527%20%2835221%29/fast/css/text-transform-select-pretty-diff.html - http://build.webkit.sed.hu/results/x86-64%20Linux%20Qt%20Release/r111527%20%2835221%29/fast/forms/select/menulist-disabled-option-diffs.html These tests fail on Qt,GTK, Chromium too. GTK guys landed failing expected result for it - http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/111513/trunk/LayoutTests/platform/gtk/fast/css/text-transform-select-expected.txt and Chromium guys did it too - http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/111506 584058 4 ossy 2012-03-21 06:16:05 -0700 Just a question: Why don't we simple rollout r111497 and let the author fix the regression caused by his patch? We make extra work for us if we commit failing expected files, skip failing tests, etc. 584083 5 ossy 2012-03-21 06:40:03 -0700 (In reply to comment #4) > Just a question: Why don't we simple rollout r111497 and let the author fix the regression caused by his patch? We make extra work for us if we commit failing expected files, skip failing tests, etc. Rolled out with gardenings too - http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/111532. (rs=Philipp) 584111 6 mitz 2012-03-21 07:20:29 -0700 (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Just a question: Why don't we simple rollout r111497 and let the author fix the regression caused by his patch? We make extra work for us if we commit failing expected files, skip failing tests, etc. > > Rolled out with gardenings too - http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/111532. (rs=Philipp) Thanks. Is there a reason why you didn’t change this bug’s status to Resolved? 584112 7 ossy 2012-03-21 07:21:22 -0700 (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > Just a question: Why don't we simple rollout r111497 and let the author fix the regression caused by his patch? We make extra work for us if we commit failing expected files, skip failing tests, etc. > > > > Rolled out with gardenings too - http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/111532. (rs=Philipp) > > Thanks. Is there a reason why you didn’t change this bug’s status to Resolved? Yes, I forgot it. :)