<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>78812</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2012-02-16 07:40:50 -0800</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Removing the last presentation attribute should result in a null attributeStyle().</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2012-02-17 01:21:01 -0800</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>DOM</component>
          <version>528+ (Nightly build)</version>
          <rep_platform>Unspecified</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Unspecified</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>Normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>78798</blocked>
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Andreas Kling">kling</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Andreas Kling">kling</assigned_to>
          <cc>eric</cc>
    
    <cc>koivisto</cc>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>558182</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Andreas Kling">kling</who>
    <bug_when>2012-02-16 07:40:50 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>Hanging an empty attribute style on a StyledElement is a waste of resources. If updateAttributeStyle() doesn&apos;t find any presentation attributes we should set a null attributeStyle.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>558185</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
      <attachid>127377</attachid>
    <who name="Andreas Kling">kling</who>
    <bug_when>2012-02-16 07:45:48 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 127377
Patch</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>558208</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
      <attachid>127377</attachid>
    <who name="Andreas Kling">kling</who>
    <bug_when>2012-02-16 08:18:01 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 127377
Patch

We can avoid the heap allocation altogether if we don&apos;t have any presentation attributes..</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>558220</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
      <attachid>127377</attachid>
    <who name="Andreas Kling">kling</who>
    <bug_when>2012-02-16 08:33:12 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 127377
Patch

Actually, calling the isPresentationAttribute() virtual on every attribute is more expensive than avoiding the temporary StylePropertySet.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>558574</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Eric Seidel (no email)">eric</who>
    <bug_when>2012-02-16 15:09:58 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>So this is a performance fix?  Memory fix?  Or is this in any way visible to the web?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>559020</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Andreas Kling">kling</who>
    <bug_when>2012-02-17 01:02:05 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>Committed r108049: &lt;http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/108049&gt;</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>559026</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Andreas Kling">kling</who>
    <bug_when>2012-02-17 01:21:01 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #4)
&gt; So this is a performance fix?  Memory fix?  Or is this in any way visible to the web?

It&apos;s a small performance and memory fix for cases where removing an attribute on an element and causing it to no longer have any presentation attributes is slightly more efficient.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>127377</attachid>
            <date>2012-02-16 07:45:48 -0800</date>
            <delta_ts>2012-02-16 16:58:12 -0800</delta_ts>
            <desc>Patch</desc>
            <filename>bug-78812.diff</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <size>2714</size>
            <attacher name="Andreas Kling">kling</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">ZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL1NvdXJjZS9XZWJDb3JlL0NoYW5nZUxvZyBiL1NvdXJjZS9XZWJDb3JlL0No
YW5nZUxvZwppbmRleCAxNTE4Y2I3Li4wODZjNmE3IDEwMDY0NAotLS0gYS9Tb3VyY2UvV2ViQ29y
ZS9DaGFuZ2VMb2cKKysrIGIvU291cmNlL1dlYkNvcmUvQ2hhbmdlTG9nCkBAIC0xLDMgKzEsMTgg
QEAKKzIwMTItMDItMTYgIEFuZHJlYXMgS2xpbmcgIDxhd2Vzb21la2xpbmdAYXBwbGUuY29tPgor
CisgICAgICAgIFJlbW92aW5nIHRoZSBsYXN0IHByZXNlbnRhdGlvbiBhdHRyaWJ1dGUgc2hvdWxk
IHJlc3VsdCBpbiBhIG51bGwgYXR0cmlidXRlU3R5bGUoKS4KKyAgICAgICAgPGh0dHA6Ly93ZWJr
aXQub3JnL2IvNzg4MTI+CisKKyAgICAgICAgUmV2aWV3ZWQgYnkgTk9CT0RZIChPT1BTISkuCisK
KyAgICAgICAgSWYgdGhlIGNvbGxlY3RTdHlsZUZvckF0dHJpYnV0ZSgpIHBhc3MgaW4gdXBkYXRl
QXR0cmlidXRlU3R5bGUoKSBkb2Vzbid0IGVuY291bnRlciBhbnkKKyAgICAgICAgcmVzcGVjdGVk
IHByZXNlbnRhdGlvbiBhdHRyaWJ1dGVzLCBzZXQgYSBudWxsIGF0dHJpYnV0ZVN0eWxlKCkgaW5z
dGVhZCBvZiBhbiBlbXB0eSBvbmUuCisKKyAgICAgICAgKiBjc3MvQ1NTU3R5bGVTZWxlY3Rvci5j
cHA6CisgICAgICAgIChXZWJDb3JlOjpDU1NTdHlsZVNlbGVjdG9yOjpjb2xsZWN0TWF0Y2hpbmdS
dWxlc0Zvckxpc3QpOgorICAgICAgICAqIGRvbS9TdHlsZWRFbGVtZW50LmNwcDoKKyAgICAgICAg
KFdlYkNvcmU6OlN0eWxlZEVsZW1lbnQ6OnVwZGF0ZUF0dHJpYnV0ZVN0eWxlKToKKwogMjAxMi0w
Mi0xNiAgU2hhd24gU2luZ2ggIDxzaGF3bnNpbmdoQGNocm9taXVtLm9yZz4KIAogICAgICAgICBb
Y2hyb21pdW1dIFJlZmFjdG9yIENDTGF5ZXJUcmVlSG9zdENvbW1vbjogY3JlYXRlIGhlbHBlciBm
dW5jdGlvbiBmb3IgY29tcGxleCBib29sZWFuIGNvbmRpdGlvbgpkaWZmIC0tZ2l0IGEvU291cmNl
L1dlYkNvcmUvY3NzL0NTU1N0eWxlU2VsZWN0b3IuY3BwIGIvU291cmNlL1dlYkNvcmUvY3NzL0NT
U1N0eWxlU2VsZWN0b3IuY3BwCmluZGV4IDMxNzEzYWQuLmMwODZhOGYgMTAwNjQ0Ci0tLSBhL1Nv
dXJjZS9XZWJDb3JlL2Nzcy9DU1NTdHlsZVNlbGVjdG9yLmNwcAorKysgYi9Tb3VyY2UvV2ViQ29y
ZS9jc3MvQ1NTU3R5bGVTZWxlY3Rvci5jcHAKQEAgLTEwMjYsMTIgKzEwMjYsMTAgQEAgdm9pZCBD
U1NTdHlsZVNlbGVjdG9yOjptYXRjaEFsbFJ1bGVzKE1hdGNoUmVzdWx0JiByZXN1bHQpCiAgICAg
Ly8gTm93IGNoZWNrIGF1dGhvciBydWxlcywgYmVnaW5uaW5nIGZpcnN0IHdpdGggcHJlc2VudGF0
aW9uYWwgYXR0cmlidXRlcyBtYXBwZWQgZnJvbSBIVE1MLgogICAgIGlmIChtX3N0eWxlZEVsZW1l
bnQpIHsKICAgICAgICAgaWYgKFN0eWxlUHJvcGVydHlTZXQqIGF0dHJpYnV0ZVN0eWxlID0gbV9z
dHlsZWRFbGVtZW50LT5hdHRyaWJ1dGVTdHlsZSgpKSB7Ci0gICAgICAgICAgICBpZiAoIWF0dHJp
YnV0ZVN0eWxlLT5pc0VtcHR5KCkpIHsKLSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICByZXN1bHQucmFuZ2VzLmxh
c3RBdXRob3JSdWxlID0gbV9tYXRjaGVkUnVsZXMuc2l6ZSgpOwotICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGlm
IChyZXN1bHQucmFuZ2VzLmZpcnN0QXV0aG9yUnVsZSA9PSAtMSkKLSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgcmVzdWx0LnJhbmdlcy5maXJzdEF1dGhvclJ1bGUgPSByZXN1bHQucmFuZ2VzLmxhc3RBdXRo
b3JSdWxlOwotICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGFkZE1hdGNoZWRQcm9wZXJ0aWVzKHJlc3VsdCwgYXR0
cmlidXRlU3R5bGUpOwotICAgICAgICAgICAgfQorICAgICAgICAgICAgcmVzdWx0LnJhbmdlcy5s
YXN0QXV0aG9yUnVsZSA9IG1fbWF0Y2hlZFJ1bGVzLnNpemUoKTsKKyAgICAgICAgICAgIGlmIChy
ZXN1bHQucmFuZ2VzLmZpcnN0QXV0aG9yUnVsZSA9PSAtMSkKKyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICByZXN1
bHQucmFuZ2VzLmZpcnN0QXV0aG9yUnVsZSA9IHJlc3VsdC5yYW5nZXMubGFzdEF1dGhvclJ1bGU7
CisgICAgICAgICAgICBhZGRNYXRjaGVkUHJvcGVydGllcyhyZXN1bHQsIGF0dHJpYnV0ZVN0eWxl
KTsKICAgICAgICAgfQogCiAgICAgICAgIC8vIE5vdyB3ZSBjaGVjayBhZGRpdGlvbmFsIG1hcHBl
ZCBkZWNsYXJhdGlvbnMuCmRpZmYgLS1naXQgYS9Tb3VyY2UvV2ViQ29yZS9kb20vU3R5bGVkRWxl
bWVudC5jcHAgYi9Tb3VyY2UvV2ViQ29yZS9kb20vU3R5bGVkRWxlbWVudC5jcHAKaW5kZXggMjc3
NzI1Yi4uMjBlMjkzMiAxMDA2NDQKLS0tIGEvU291cmNlL1dlYkNvcmUvZG9tL1N0eWxlZEVsZW1l
bnQuY3BwCisrKyBiL1NvdXJjZS9XZWJDb3JlL2RvbS9TdHlsZWRFbGVtZW50LmNwcApAQCAtMTgz
LDcgKzE4MywxMSBAQCB2b2lkIFN0eWxlZEVsZW1lbnQ6OnVwZGF0ZUF0dHJpYnV0ZVN0eWxlKCkK
ICAgICAgICAgY29sbGVjdFN0eWxlRm9yQXR0cmlidXRlKGF0dHJpYnV0ZSwgc3R5bGUuZ2V0KCkp
OwogICAgIH0KICAgICBjbGVhckF0dHJpYnV0ZVN0eWxlRGlydHkoKTsKLSAgICBlbnN1cmVBdHRy
aWJ1dGVEYXRhKCktPnNldEF0dHJpYnV0ZVN0eWxlKHN0eWxlLnJlbGVhc2UoKSk7CisKKyAgICBp
ZiAoc3R5bGUtPmlzRW1wdHkoKSkKKyAgICAgICAgYXR0cmlidXRlRGF0YSgpLT5zZXRBdHRyaWJ1
dGVTdHlsZSgwKTsKKyAgICBlbHNlCisgICAgICAgIGF0dHJpYnV0ZURhdGEoKS0+c2V0QXR0cmli
dXRlU3R5bGUoc3R5bGUucmVsZWFzZSgpKTsKIH0KIAogfQo=
</data>
<flag name="review"
          id="129492"
          type_id="1"
          status="+"
          setter="koivisto"
    />
          </attachment>
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>