40829 html5test 2010-06-18 05:13:11 -0700 Get a perfect score on html5test.com 2023-05-15 01:05:54 -0700 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit WebKit Misc. 528+ (Nightly build) All All RESOLVED WORKSFORME http://html5test.com/ HTML5 P2 Enhancement --- 19264 43668 3251 27247 29326 29359 29363 32624 33938 38157 38994 41123 42903 43572 44358 44515 45950 58454 61140 68156 68609 73177 76760 76766 78244 83533 84353 1 cyberskull webkit-unassigned abarth alexgtk19 annevk arv ddkilzer donggwan.kim eoconnor eric.carlson eric grahamperrin gsherloc laszlo.gombos peter rakeshchaitan rcombs Reelix staikos syoichi tonikitoo webkit.org webmaster oldest_to_newest 239870 0 cyberskull 2010-06-18 05:13:11 -0700 The website <http://html5test.com/> tests browsers for the existence of HTML5 features and can be used to gauge the progress of features. I'd like to see WebKit hit 300/300 before the other engines do. Note that this site only currently checks for the existence of features, not that they are correct. Current scores (running on Mac OS X 10.5 PPC): WebKit 533 (Safari 5): 208 + 9. Firefox 3.6.3: 139 + 4. Opera 10.53 (Presto 2.5.24): 129 +4. WebKit r61351: 230 + 9. Firefox 3.6.4 (Build 7): 139 + 4 Note that I have the Xiph.org Ogg/Theora/Vorbis plugin installed, giving my machine an extra point. 239874 1 cyberskull 2010-06-18 05:21:42 -0700 I forgot the iPhone! iPhone 3G, iPhone OS 3.1.3 (iOS 3.1.3): WebKit 528.18: 125 + 7 Opera Mini: 22. 241057 2 cyberskull 2010-06-21 19:12:19 -0700 iPhone 3G/iOS 4, WebKit 532.9: 185 + 7 241304 3 ap 2010-06-22 10:00:28 -0700 I'm not sure if getting 300/300 on this test should necessarily be a goal. But it's interesting that this test claims there's no "HTML5 tokenizer" or "HTML5 tree building" in ToT. The very first subtest fails: div.innerHTML = "<div<div>" is expected to add a node with name "DIV<DIV". 242480 4 cyberskull 2010-06-24 06:21:00 -0700 WebKit r61744: 231 + 9 What is ToT? 245406 5 cyberskull 2010-07-01 10:00:49 -0700 WebKit r62241 235/300 +9 247492 6 cyberskull 2010-07-07 05:13:07 -0700 WebKit r62632: 236 + 9 249181 7 cyberskull 2010-07-09 12:34:30 -0700 WebKit r62909: 232 + 9. 254425 8 ddkilzer 2010-07-21 11:10:40 -0700 (In reply to comment #2) > iPhone 3G/iOS 4, WebKit 532.9: 185 + 7 This is being tracked for iPhone using: <rdar://problem/8215076> We also have radars covering differences between Safari 5 and iOS 4.0.x, so there's no need to file other bugs. We will also eventually pick up fixes committed to trunk as well. 255379 9 cyberskull 2010-07-23 08:01:58 -0700 WebKit r63958: 222 + 10 257645 10 webkit.org 2010-07-29 06:10:02 -0700 I’m all for progress, but after the fun with HTML5 form validation I’d prefer usable HTML implementations over rushing to ship: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40747 https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40761 That said, keep on truckin’ Webkit peeps :) 265382 11 cyberskull 2010-08-17 00:18:36 -0700 WebKit r65398: 227 + 10 (Tokenizer now detected!) 266121 12 ddkilzer 2010-08-18 08:35:05 -0700 (In reply to comment #11) > WebKit r65398: 227 + 10 (Tokenizer now detected!) Why did the score go down from a high of 236 + 9 in Comment #6? 266617 13 cyberskull 2010-08-19 03:41:54 -0700 (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > WebKit r65398: 227 + 10 (Tokenizer now detected!) > > Why did the score go down from a high of 236 + 9 in Comment #6? Mainly due to WebGL being broken/gone. That is 10 points there. 269720 14 cyberskull 2010-08-25 22:40:29 -0700 Webkit r66052: 232+12 ! 306040 15 cyberskull 2010-11-08 00:42:41 -0800 WebKit r71484: 233 + 12! <output> now supported & detected. 330066 16 cyberskull 2011-01-06 01:28:36 -0800 WebKit r74228: 235 + 12, I'm guessing figure and figcaption support. 342350 17 rcombs 2011-01-30 11:57:54 -0800 May I request that we move the URL to http://beta.html5test.com/ and change the title to "Get 400/400 points on the HTML5 Test"? 342402 18 gsherloc 2011-01-30 16:52:10 -0800 I get 288 + 9 points, on r75891 at http://beta.html5test.com/. Note, to enable WebGL, you have to do: defaults write com.apple.Safari WebKitWebGLEnabled -bool YES 342409 19 rcombs 2011-01-30 17:41:59 -0800 In normal, I get 245+15. In beta, I get 288+15. This is with WebGL plus every media plugin imaginable. 342435 20 cyberskull 2011-01-30 19:52:44 -0800 (In reply to comment #17) > May I request that we move the URL to http://beta.html5test.com/ and change the title to "Get 400/400 points on the HTML5 Test"? I think if any tests should be strived for, the stable release tests should be the priority over the beta tests. While 400/400 sounds better, the beta tests could be updated at any time completely hosing the score of anything being tested. 342436 21 cyberskull 2011-01-30 19:54:57 -0800 (In reply to comment #18) > I get 288 + 9 points, on r75891 at http://beta.html5test.com/. Note, to enable WebGL, you have to do: > > defaults write com.apple.Safari WebKitWebGLEnabled -bool YES Has WebGL been re-enabled? I have it turned on but none of the WebGL code runs. 363118 22 cyberskull 2011-03-06 13:02:33 -0800 The HTML5 test has been updated, it is now 400 points! Here's how the browsers do (based on what I can run on 10.5 PPC ;) ): * WebKit r80210: 273 + 12 * Safari 5.0.3: 228 + 9 * Safari (iOS 4.2.1): 206 + 7 * Firefox 3.6.14: 155 + 4 * Opera 10.63: 214 + 7 385542 23 Reelix 2011-04-13 23:16:33 -0700 I would also like to see this. In fact - I would be happy with a base score of 300 points - Just 9 more to go! :D 385553 24 cyberskull 2011-04-13 23:52:11 -0700 WebKit r83424: 271 + 15 I updated Perian which now supports WebM, so that accounts for the bonus improvement. I wonder what broke to lower the main score? WebKit r83750: 271 + 15 416122 25 cyberskull 2011-06-06 16:53:55 -0700 WebKit r88189: 269 + 15 416377 26 Reelix 2011-06-06 23:52:22 -0700 Chrome 11.0.696.77 293 and 13 bonus points Best so far! :D 437029 27 webmaster 2011-07-14 05:07:20 -0700 Is there a bug for http://www.html5accessibility.com/HTML5ASS/ 437032 28 cyberskull 2011-07-14 05:19:29 -0700 (In reply to comment #27) > Is there a bug for http://www.html5accessibility.com/HTML5ASS/ You should just create one. 440756 29 cyberskull 2011-07-21 17:49:36 -0700 Safari 5.0.6 (5533.22.3): 293 + 15. 540025 30 eric 2012-01-20 19:42:20 -0800 I went through the test suite this afternoon and broke down all our failures in this spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlC4tS7Ao1fIdHZtUDNsOFNFYmxGbzZFVVJERUswZFE#gid=0 The end result is that we're already the "best" engine according to html5test.com, and almost all of the remaining tests we either already pass (and the suite is wrong) or we have code in progress (either behind compile-time flags, or with webkit- prefix guards). About the only interesting implementation work left might be <command> (bug 58454), HTMLInputElement.dirname (bug 76766), and seamless iframes (bug 45950). 540240 31 cyberskull 2012-01-22 04:21:18 -0800 As of the 2012-01-01 update: * Safari 5.0.6 (5533.22.3) on 10.5.8 PPC: 302 + 15 764790 32 cyberskull 2012-11-12 13:56:43 -0800 WebKit r134216 (OS X 10.8.2 Intel 64): 388+15 Safari 6.0.2 (OS X 10.8.2 Intel 64): 378+15 1955367 33 annevk 2023-05-15 01:05:54 -0700 html5test.com was last updated in 2016. Tracking it has served its purpose.