<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>37426</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2010-04-11 18:45:27 -0700</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>new-run-webkit-tests should use the ServerProcess abstraction in chromium.py</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2011-05-31 18:54:00 -0700</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>Tools / Tests</component>
          <version>528+ (Nightly build)</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>OS X 10.5</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>WONTFIX</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>Normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Dirk Pranke">dpranke</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Nobody">webkit-unassigned</assigned_to>
          <cc>aroben</cc>
    
    <cc>dpranke</cc>
    
    <cc>tony</cc>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>211480</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Dirk Pranke">dpranke</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-11 18:45:27 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>The code to launch and read from test_shell in chromium.py predates the ServerProcess abstraction that WebKit Mac uses. It should be rewritten to use it to minimize code duplication.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>308337</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Dirk Pranke">dpranke</who>
    <bug_when>2010-11-11 20:00:54 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>Tony, I&apos;m punting this over to you, because it becomes true when we remove the test_shell code and only use DRT.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>308617</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Tony Chang">tony</who>
    <bug_when>2010-11-12 10:05:14 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>Ok, after we switch, I&apos;ll see about removing the test_shell related code.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>345912</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Tony Chang">tony</who>
    <bug_when>2011-02-04 16:34:59 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>Hmm, as mentioned in bug 34826 comment 20, it is non-trivial to make use of ServerProcess on Windows python.  I&apos;m not sure if this is something we want to pursue.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>370071</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Dirk Pranke">dpranke</who>
    <bug_when>2011-03-18 18:46:53 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>punting back to me ;)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>381075</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Dirk Pranke">dpranke</who>
    <bug_when>2011-04-06 19:44:43 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>I don&apos;t think it should block bug 34984 and I plan to clear the blocking flag on Mon 4/11. If you disagree, now would be a good time to speak up :).</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>384587</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Dirk Pranke">dpranke</who>
    <bug_when>2011-04-12 18:05:31 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>clearing blocking flag.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>387059</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Dirk Pranke">dpranke</who>
    <bug_when>2011-04-15 17:11:49 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>See bug 37426 for a way to make serverprocess work w/o blocking on win32.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>413077</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Dirk Pranke">dpranke</who>
    <bug_when>2011-05-31 18:54:00 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>A more accurate description of this would probably be that we should just use the WebKitDriver implementation if we ever want to switch the Chromium DRT to webkit-style output.

Whether or not the WebKitDriver implementation works on windows is a separate issue that should probably be tracked under a separate bug.

I&apos;m marking this as WONTFIX for now and clearing ownership; if anyone disagrees, feel free to reopen it.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>