<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>37207</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2010-04-07 06:53:52 -0700</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[Qt] QtWebKit 2.0 library version needs to be maintained in WebCore.pro</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2010-05-02 14:59:40 -0700</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>Tools / Tests</component>
          <version>528+ (Nightly build)</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>Qt</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>Normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>35784</blocked>
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Simon Hausmann">hausmann</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="QtWebKit Unassigned">webkit-qt-unassigned</assigned_to>
          <cc>jturcotte</cc>
    
    <cc>kenneth</cc>
    
    <cc>koshuin</cc>
    
    <cc>rclbelem</cc>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>209615</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Simon Hausmann">hausmann</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-07 06:53:52 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Currently WebCore.pro picks up the library version from Qt:

CONFIG(QTDIR_build) {
    include($$QT_SOURCE_TREE/src/qbase.pri)
    # Qt will set the version for us when building in Qt&apos;s tree
} else {
    VERSION = $${QT_MAJOR_VERSION}.$${QT_MINOR_VERSION}.$${QT_PATCH_VERSION}
    DESTDIR = $$OUTPUT_DIR/lib
    !static: DEFINES += QT_MAKEDLL
}

Instead we should set the version ourselves, i.e. we should start with 4.7.0 in the trunk and in the release branch.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>212803</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
      <attachid>53422</attachid>
    <who name="Janne Koskinen">koshuin</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-15 04:47:39 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 53422
intial suggestion as conversation starter</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>212804</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
      <attachid>53423</attachid>
    <who name="Janne Koskinen">koshuin</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-15 04:48:25 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 53423
how it looks on Qt side</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>212807</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Janne Koskinen">koshuin</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-15 04:55:22 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Ok some commenting. Symbian needs to know the version of webkit when creating sis packages to make correct dependencies to DLL/installed webkit version.

Patch proposes to add a new file containing the version information under WebKit/qt tree where this is then included into webcore.pro.

When user makes a application using qtwebkit from Qt tree he will get the version that is currently coming with Qt. if user decides to install new webkit release he&apos;d get the version from that tree. Downside is that he needs to set WEBKITDIR to this to work.

Another problem that is not visible from this patch (yet) is that we already have shipped Symbian QtWebkit with version 4.6.2 and upcoming 4.7.1 so we need to start QtWebkit 2.0 version from higher than those to maintain proper dependency to versions. My suggestion is that we start QtWebkit numbering from 20 i.e. every subsequent release of QtWebkit would have it&apos;s major version number multiplied by 10. Minor and Patch numbers would not be touched.

As you can see in the Qt side there is a fallback version. this fallback number would be used on times when QtWebkit version 2.0 would be installed on top of 4.6 but user would have not set WEBKIT dir. My suggestion for the fallback number is 4.6 or to print warning.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>213463</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Simon Hausmann">hausmann</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-16 16:03:03 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>To retain binary compatibility we have to keep on using the major version 4 for the qtwebkit 2.0 release and later.

In addition the minor version of the DLL with qtwebkit 2.0 has to be greater than 6.

Therefore 4.7 is a natural choice over 2.0</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>213468</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Simon Hausmann">hausmann</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-16 16:06:06 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>In other words, Janne, when installing qtwebkit 2.0 over an existing Qt installation on Symbian, it is important that the pkg_depends_webkit from symbian/qt.prf includes the correct and _updated_ version number.

I think your approach of installing an optionally included .pri file is a good idea. Jocelyn, what do you think?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>213944</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Jocelyn Turcotte">jturcotte</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-19 01:09:25 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #5)
&gt; I think your approach of installing an optionally included .pri file is a good
&gt; idea. Jocelyn, what do you think?

I&apos;m for that as well


(In reply to comment #4)
&gt; To retain binary compatibility we have to keep on using the major version 4 for
&gt; the qtwebkit 2.0 release and later.
&gt; 
&gt; In addition the minor version of the DLL with qtwebkit 2.0 has to be greater
&gt; than 6.
&gt; 
&gt; Therefore 4.7 is a natural choice over 2.0

If we ever create official releases between Qt SDK releases, numbering it 4.7 now will be confusing later.

What about starting from 4.20.0 then?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>214504</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Janne Koskinen">koshuin</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-19 23:57:23 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #6)
&gt; (In reply to comment #5)
&gt; &gt; I think your approach of installing an optionally included .pri file is a good
&gt; &gt; idea. Jocelyn, what do you think?
&gt; 
&gt; I&apos;m for that as well

Excellent.

&gt; (In reply to comment #4)
&gt; &gt; Therefore 4.7 is a natural choice over 2.0
&gt; 
&gt; If we ever create official releases between Qt SDK releases, numbering it 4.7
&gt; now will be confusing later.
&gt; 
&gt; What about starting from 4.20.0 then?

This was my reasoning for setting it to 20.0.0 from start. If next release is 4.7 then what will be the next one...</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>217033</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Kenneth Rohde Christiansen">kenneth</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-26 05:37:20 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Any update on this? I&apos;m personally OK with so.4.20</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>217037</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="Jocelyn Turcotte">jturcotte</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-26 05:46:15 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #8)
&gt; Any update on this? I&apos;m personally OK with so.4.20

Thought about it and 4.20 would cause problems when we get to 2.11. This would limit us to have max 10 minor releases per major.

Using 4.200.0 would probably give us enough of them.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>217527</commentid>
    <comment_count>10</comment_count>
    <who name="Janne Koskinen">koshuin</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-26 23:14:53 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #9)
&gt; (In reply to comment #8)
&gt; &gt; Any update on this? I&apos;m personally OK with so.4.20
&gt; 
&gt; Thought about it and 4.20 would cause problems when we get to 2.11. This would
&gt; limit us to have max 10 minor releases per major.
&gt; 
&gt; Using 4.200.0 would probably give us enough of them.

And what about with Qt 5.0 release ? QtWebkit would still continue with 4.x series?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>217574</commentid>
    <comment_count>11</comment_count>
    <who name="Janne Koskinen">koshuin</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-27 01:14:45 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #10)
&gt; &gt; Using 4.200.0 would probably give us enough of them.

Here is an issue. Symbian binaries won&apos;t have separate minor and build number so when checking for dll eclipsing we compress  minor and build number into 2 bytes leaving 1 byte for each number i.e. minor and build number cannot be larger than 255.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>218316</commentid>
    <comment_count>12</comment_count>
    <who name="Simon Hausmann">hausmann</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-28 04:10:20 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #11)
&gt; (In reply to comment #10)
&gt; &gt; &gt; Using 4.200.0 would probably give us enough of them.
&gt; 
&gt; Here is an issue. Symbian binaries won&apos;t have separate minor and build number
&gt; so when checking for dll eclipsing we compress  minor and build number into 2
&gt; bytes leaving 1 byte for each number i.e. minor and build number cannot be
&gt; larger than 255.

Good point.

What&apos;s wrong with just 4.7 then? :) If we can&apos;t find anything better, then let&apos;s continue with what we&apos;ve done in the past.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>218377</commentid>
    <comment_count>13</comment_count>
    <who name="Jocelyn Turcotte">jturcotte</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-28 06:57:28 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #12)
&gt; What&apos;s wrong with just 4.7 then? :) If we can&apos;t find anything better, then
&gt; let&apos;s continue with what we&apos;ve done in the past.

We talked about it a bit here and I also think it would be alright to keep it to 4.7 for this release.

- The release and API version is QtWebKit 2.0 (and it&apos;s shipped with Qt 4.7, we can also say that it&apos;s Qt 4.7&apos;s QtWebKit version)
- The binary version is 4.7 (even if compiled with Qt 4.6)

Since we decided to ship QtWebKit 2.0 with Qt 4.7, the only difference with before is that we support to build it using Qt 4.6.

We probably won&apos;t get more than one QtWebKit release between Qt releases until a while so until then we will be able to keep the QtWebKit binary version same as Qt&apos;s one. Once we get a clearer view on how other Qt external modules want to handle their versions, we&apos;ll be able to go in the same direction.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>218986</commentid>
    <comment_count>14</comment_count>
      <attachid>54692</attachid>
    <who name="Janne Koskinen">koshuin</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-29 06:18:27 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 54692
proposed change

QtWebkit 2.0 version will be 4.7.0.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>219913</commentid>
    <comment_count>15</comment_count>
    <who name="Simon Hausmann">hausmann</who>
    <bug_when>2010-05-02 14:51:16 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Landed in the trunk with 4.8.0, as that&apos;s what QtWebKit 2.1&apos;s library version is going to be

Committed r58661: &lt;http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/58661&gt;</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>219914</commentid>
    <comment_count>16</comment_count>
    <who name="Simon Hausmann">hausmann</who>
    <bug_when>2010-05-02 14:58:44 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Revision r58661 cherry-picked into qtwebkit-2.0 with commit 09985156d31032da87aab00472943af2860baf04</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>219915</commentid>
    <comment_count>17</comment_count>
    <who name="Simon Hausmann">hausmann</who>
    <bug_when>2010-05-02 14:59:40 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #16)
&gt; Revision r58661 cherry-picked into qtwebkit-2.0 with commit
&gt; 09985156d31032da87aab00472943af2860baf04

I should note that this cherry-pick has the library version set to 4.7.0 instead of 4.8.0 for the trunk.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="1"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>53422</attachid>
            <date>2010-04-15 04:47:39 -0700</date>
            <delta_ts>2010-04-29 06:18:27 -0700</delta_ts>
            <desc>intial suggestion as conversation starter</desc>
            <filename>suggestion.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <size>992</size>
            <attacher name="Janne Koskinen">koshuin</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">ZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL1dlYkNvcmUvV2ViQ29yZS5wcm8gYi9XZWJDb3JlL1dlYkNvcmUucHJvCmlu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</data>

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="1"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>53423</attachid>
            <date>2010-04-15 04:48:25 -0700</date>
            <delta_ts>2010-04-29 06:18:27 -0700</delta_ts>
            <desc>how it looks on Qt side</desc>
            <filename>qt_symbian.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <size>1263</size>
            <attacher name="Janne Koskinen">koshuin</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">ZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL21rc3BlY3MvZmVhdHVyZXMvc3ltYmlhbi9xdC5wcmYgYi9ta3NwZWNzL2Zl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</data>

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>54692</attachid>
            <date>2010-04-29 06:18:27 -0700</date>
            <delta_ts>2010-05-02 14:37:31 -0700</delta_ts>
            <desc>proposed change</desc>
            <filename>webkitversion.diff</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <size>2136</size>
            <attacher name="Janne Koskinen">koshuin</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">ZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL1dlYkNvcmUvQ2hhbmdlTG9nIGIvV2ViQ29yZS9DaGFuZ2VMb2cKaW5kZXgg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</data>
<flag name="review"
          id="38709"
          type_id="1"
          status="+"
          setter="hausmann"
    />
          </attachment>
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>