<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugs.webkit.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4.1"
          urlbase="https://bugs.webkit.org/"
          
          maintainer="admin@webkit.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>35830</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2010-03-06 11:52:52 -0800</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Unable to use Hotmail.com mail features, as clicking on links seems not to work</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2014-04-24 16:45:13 -0700</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebKit</product>
          <component>JavaScriptCore</component>
          <version>528+ (Nightly build)</version>
          <rep_platform>Other</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>WONTFIX</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>Gtk, Qt, QtTriaged</keywords>
          <priority>P1</priority>
          <bug_severity>Major</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>35784</blocked>
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>pano_90</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Simon Hausmann">hausmann</assigned_to>
          <cc>gustavo</cc>
    
    <cc>hausmann</cc>
    
    <cc>jedrzej.nowacki</cc>
    
    <cc>jturcotte</cc>
    
    <cc>kenneth</cc>
    
    <cc>kent.hansen</cc>
    
    <cc>koivisto</cc>
    
    <cc>laszlo.gombos</cc>
    
    <cc>nancy.piedra</cc>
    
    <cc>vikram.malaiya</cc>
    
    <cc>yael</cc>
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>196928</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="">pano_90</who>
    <bug_when>2010-03-06 11:52:52 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>When arriving to hotmail.com&apos;s page which lists your e-mails, nothing works,
clicking links doesn&apos;t do anything.
It does not work in rekonq, nor arora.

I created a test account on hotmail so that you don&apos;t have to :-P

Username:
weqtvy3@hotmail.com

Password:
123456

After logging in, you might see a page stating that you should upgrade your webbrowser. Simply ignore this and browse to the mails by clicking on Mail in the upper part of the website.
clicking on the mail does not work, the commands (on the lower part of the website &quot;New, Delete, Junk …&quot;) do not work either.



Original bug report: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=228475


Thanks :-)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>196929</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="">pano_90</who>
    <bug_when>2010-03-06 11:57:58 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>Forgot to mention:

Tested here with Qt 4.6.1</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>198067</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Tor Arne Vestbø">vestbo</who>
    <bug_when>2010-03-10 06:33:23 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>
Please follow the QtWebKit bug reporting guidelines when reporting bugs.

See http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/QtWebKitBugs

Specifically:

  - The &apos;QtWebKit&apos; component should only be used for bugs/features in the
    public QtWebKit API layer, not to signify that the bug is specific to
    the Qt port of WebKit

      http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/QtWebKitBugs#Component

  - Add the keyword &apos;Qt&apos; to signal that it&apos;s a Qt-related bug

      http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/QtWebKitBugs#Keywords</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>198572</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Jocelyn Turcotte">jturcotte</who>
    <bug_when>2010-03-11 05:45:56 -0800</bug_when>
    <thetext>Reproduced in trunk with Qt 4.6.

We have to try fixing this for the next issue, depending on the work needed.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>201323</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Jędrzej Nowacki">jedrzej.nowacki</who>
    <bug_when>2010-03-18 08:50:21 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Reproduced on Linux(32 bit Debian/testing):
- with trunk of the Qt and the WebKit using QtLauncher.
- with trunk of the WebKit using GtkLauncher.

I tried to debug it, but it is rather difficult with obscured JavaScript code from that page. If someone know how to debug this kind of bugs, please share your knowledge :-).</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>209041</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Kent Hansen">kent.hansen</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-06 07:32:53 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #4)
&gt; I tried to debug it, but it is rather difficult with obscured JavaScript code
&gt; from that page. If someone know how to debug this kind of bugs, please share
&gt; your knowledge :-).

I used http://jsbeautifier.org to unminify the JS.
http://gfx6.hotmail.com/mail/15.1.3057.0331/i0a.mozilla.js seems to contain the relevant code, e.g. search for NewMessage / newMsg for code that should be triggered when clicking on the &quot;New&quot; item.
My idea for debugging is to patch the network handler to deliver the unminified versions of the scripts, so that we can get line numbers and set breakpoints in the Inspector. We can even insert debug statements in the unminified script... :-)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>210096</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Simon Hausmann">hausmann</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-08 02:20:19 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>It appears that hotmail.com does not work with our default user agent string, which is

Mozilla/5.0 (%Platform%; %Security%; %Subplatform%; %Locale%) AppleWebKit/%WebKitVersion% (KHTML, like Gecko) %AppVersion Safari/%WebKitVersion%


However it works when inserting a Version/4.0 component, so that the resulting string is for example on Linux:

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 QtLauncher/0.1  Safari/533.4


What do you guys think about adding the &quot;arbitrary&quot; Version/4.0 compoment?

Note that the order is significant: It only works if the Version component follows directly the AppleWebKit/... (KHTML...) part.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>210116</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Yael">yael</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-08 05:17:35 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #6)

&gt; What do you guys think about adding the &quot;arbitrary&quot; Version/4.0 compoment?
&gt; 
&gt; Note that the order is significant: It only works if the Version component
&gt; follows directly the AppleWebKit/... (KHTML...) part.

A few years ago we updated webkit in S60, to the version of Safari 3.0. At the time, I did exactly the same thing in order to make hotmail.com work. (add version 3.0)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>210117</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Kenneth Rohde Christiansen">kenneth</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-08 05:40:28 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #6)
&gt; It appears that hotmail.com does not work with our default user agent string,
&gt; which is
&gt; 
&gt; Mozilla/5.0 (%Platform%; %Security%; %Subplatform%; %Locale%)
&gt; AppleWebKit/%WebKitVersion% (KHTML, like Gecko) %AppVersion
&gt; Safari/%WebKitVersion%
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; However it works when inserting a Version/4.0 component, so that the resulting
&gt; string is for example on Linux:
&gt; 
&gt; Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko)
&gt; Version/4.0 QtLauncher/0.1  Safari/533.4
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; What do you guys think about adding the &quot;arbitrary&quot; Version/4.0 compoment?
&gt; 
&gt; Note that the order is significant: It only works if the Version component
&gt; follows directly the AppleWebKit/... (KHTML...) part.

Android adds it, and iPad adds Version/4.0.4. I think it would be fine for us to do that as well.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>210118</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="Kenneth Rohde Christiansen">kenneth</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-08 05:44:12 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>
&gt; Android adds it, and iPad adds Version/4.0.4. I think it would be fine for us
&gt; to do that as well.

The full iPad string is:

Mozilla/5.0(iPad; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/531.21.10 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.4 Mobile/7B314 Safari/531.21.10

Funny to see that they kept &quot;iPhone&quot; in the string :-) On the iPhone it doesn&apos;t say &quot;CPU iPhone OS 3_2 like Mac OS X&quot; but &quot;CPU OS 3_2 like Mac OS X&quot;</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>210120</commentid>
    <comment_count>10</comment_count>
      <attachid>52854</attachid>
    <who name="Simon Hausmann">hausmann</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-08 05:55:49 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 52854
Patch</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>210124</commentid>
    <comment_count>11</comment_count>
      <attachid>52854</attachid>
    <who name="Kenneth Rohde Christiansen">kenneth</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-08 06:17:19 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 52854
Patch

Why not use 4.0.4 as the iPad?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>210131</commentid>
    <comment_count>12</comment_count>
      <attachid>52854</attachid>
    <who name="Gustavo Noronha (kov)">gustavo</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-08 06:28:01 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 52854
Patch

Sounds good to me. rs=me on changing this to 4.0.4 if you feel the need, but I think we should be fine with the existing practice.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>210136</commentid>
    <comment_count>13</comment_count>
      <attachid>52854</attachid>
    <who name="Simon Hausmann">hausmann</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-08 06:39:02 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 52854
Patch

Thanks for the review Gustavo. I&apos;m holding off the commit queue to give some more time for feedback before landing.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>210139</commentid>
    <comment_count>14</comment_count>
    <who name="Kenneth Rohde Christiansen">kenneth</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-08 06:41:19 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #13)
&gt; (From update of attachment 52854 [details])
&gt; Thanks for the review Gustavo. I&apos;m holding off the commit queue to give some
&gt; more time for feedback before landing.

I would still like to know the advantage of using 4.0 instead of 4.0.4 which seems to be the latest version uses. Does it work with 4.0.4?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>210155</commentid>
    <comment_count>15</comment_count>
    <who name="Simon Hausmann">hausmann</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-08 07:08:32 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #14)
&gt; (In reply to comment #13)
&gt; &gt; (From update of attachment 52854 [details] [details])
&gt; &gt; Thanks for the review Gustavo. I&apos;m holding off the commit queue to give some
&gt; &gt; more time for feedback before landing.
&gt; 
&gt; I would still like to know the advantage of using 4.0 instead of 4.0.4 which
&gt; seems to be the latest version uses. Does it work with 4.0.4?

I can confirm that it works with 4.0.4, but what&apos;s the advantage of a more specific number over a major one? :)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>210157</commentid>
    <comment_count>16</comment_count>
    <who name="Kenneth Rohde Christiansen">kenneth</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-08 07:13:08 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Isn&apos;t it considered a minimum required version, thus 4.0.4 right be required by some services where 4.0 would fail? I&apos;m not sure, but there must be a reason it was chosen for iPhone and iPad.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>210164</commentid>
    <comment_count>17</comment_count>
    <who name="Kent Hansen">kent.hansen</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-08 07:29:32 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #16)
&gt; Isn&apos;t it considered a minimum required version, thus 4.0.4 right be required by
&gt; some services where 4.0 would fail? I&apos;m not sure, but there must be a reason it
&gt; was chosen for iPhone and iPad.

4.0.4 is so oldschool; it&apos;s a &quot;4.0.4 Not Found&quot; waiting to happen. 4.1 works, as does 5.0. Might as well be future-proof (it should increase the time until this task must be reopened to bump the version again). :P</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>210168</commentid>
    <comment_count>18</comment_count>
    <who name="Kenneth Rohde Christiansen">kenneth</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-08 07:35:49 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #17)
&gt; (In reply to comment #16)
&gt; &gt; Isn&apos;t it considered a minimum required version, thus 4.0.4 right be required by
&gt; &gt; some services where 4.0 would fail? I&apos;m not sure, but there must be a reason it
&gt; &gt; was chosen for iPhone and iPad.
&gt; 
&gt; 4.0.4 is so oldschool; it&apos;s a &quot;4.0.4 Not Found&quot; waiting to happen. 4.1 works,
&gt; as does 5.0. Might as well be future-proof (it should increase the time until
&gt; this task must be reopened to bump the version again). :P

Then use 4.0.5 which is the latest Safari version. The 4.0.4 or higher might be required to use some newer service being made for the iPad.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>210223</commentid>
    <comment_count>19</comment_count>
    <who name="Laszlo Gombos">laszlo.gombos</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-08 08:45:10 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>According to this content - http://www.useragentstring.com/pages/Chrome/ Chrome does not add the &quot;Version&quot; part to the UA header. Taking a closer look it seems like Chrome had this for one single version and than its gone again (see Chrome 2.0.156.0). I do not know if this info helps in any way to make this decision.

It would be good if we could only carry one cross-platform WebKit version around. With this patch it seems like we will have two version number (with the risk of the two being inconsistent).</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>210245</commentid>
    <comment_count>20</comment_count>
    <who name="Laszlo Gombos">laszlo.gombos</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-08 09:34:39 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Just to be specific, I&apos;m ok with the change but would be somehow better to pick up the number cleverly (if possible) than hard-coding it.

It would also be useful to track down the JavaScript which check for the version (instead of doing object/feature detection). If it is a JavaScript library that is used in many places would be worthwhile to fix the JavaScript library (as well).</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>210250</commentid>
    <comment_count>21</comment_count>
    <who name="Kenneth Rohde Christiansen">kenneth</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-08 09:38:41 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>kenne&gt; aroben do you know if the Version/4.0.4 in the UA is the Safari version? or what does it represent?
&lt;aroben&gt; kenne: yes, that is the Safari version</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>217124</commentid>
    <comment_count>22</comment_count>
    <who name="Simon Hausmann">hausmann</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-26 08:40:24 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #19)
&gt; According to this content - http://www.useragentstring.com/pages/Chrome/ Chrome
&gt; does not add the &quot;Version&quot; part to the UA header. Taking a closer look it seems
&gt; like Chrome had this for one single version and than its gone again (see Chrome
&gt; 2.0.156.0). I do not know if this info helps in any way to make this decision.
&gt; 
&gt; It would be good if we could only carry one cross-platform WebKit version
&gt; around. With this patch it seems like we will have two version number (with the
&gt; risk of the two being inconsistent).

What&apos;s the other option?

We have to include this tag in order for the web site to function. The tag/version does not come from WebKit but from an external third-party product ;(

I guess the other option would be to pretend to be Chrome and not include a version...</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>217172</commentid>
    <comment_count>23</comment_count>
    <who name="Kenneth Rohde Christiansen">kenneth</who>
    <bug_when>2010-04-26 10:09:52 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Or make a quirk that returns a different UA for the site?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>222318</commentid>
    <comment_count>24</comment_count>
    <who name="Kenneth Rohde Christiansen">kenneth</who>
    <bug_when>2010-05-07 06:29:10 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #23)
&gt; Or make a quirk that returns a different UA for the site?

We need to decide on this one.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>224562</commentid>
    <comment_count>25</comment_count>
    <who name="Simon Hausmann">hausmann</who>
    <bug_when>2010-05-12 06:14:02 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>We decided to try to solve this on the server side and otherwise land it as-is on May the 26th.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>226534</commentid>
    <comment_count>26</comment_count>
      <attachid>52854</attachid>
    <who name="Laszlo Gombos">laszlo.gombos</who>
    <bug_when>2010-05-16 13:55:50 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment on attachment 52854
Patch

cq- until we conclude investigation on the server side.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>229303</commentid>
    <comment_count>27</comment_count>
    <who name="Kenneth Rohde Christiansen">kenneth</who>
    <bug_when>2010-05-22 12:25:43 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #26)
&gt; (From update of attachment 52854 [details])
&gt; cq- until we conclude investigation on the server side.

Any update on this Laszlo? We have almost waited long enough.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>229378</commentid>
    <comment_count>28</comment_count>
    <who name="Laszlo Gombos">laszlo.gombos</who>
    <bug_when>2010-05-22 18:05:02 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>This is not resolved yet but I got a very promising verbal promise that fix on the server side can be arrange and with that we were asked to not hack around this issue on the client/UA side. I suggest we close this bug without committing the patch.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>229383</commentid>
    <comment_count>29</comment_count>
    <who name="Kenneth Rohde Christiansen">kenneth</who>
    <bug_when>2010-05-22 18:44:52 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Ok, let&apos;s close it then. Thanks for looking into this.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1003848</commentid>
    <comment_count>30</comment_count>
    <who name="Darin Adler">darin</who>
    <bug_when>2014-04-24 16:45:13 -0700</bug_when>
    <thetext>Moving all JavaScriptGlue bugs to JavaScriptCore. The JavaScriptGlue framework itself is long gone. And most of the more recent bugs put in this component were put there by people who thought this was for some other aspect of “JavaScript glue” and have nothing to do with the actual original reason for the existence of this component, which was an OS-X-only framework named JavaScriptGlue.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>52854</attachid>
            <date>2010-04-08 05:55:49 -0700</date>
            <delta_ts>2010-05-16 13:55:50 -0700</delta_ts>
            <desc>Patch</desc>
            <filename>bug-35830-20100408145547.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <size>3568</size>
            <attacher name="Simon Hausmann">hausmann</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">ZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL1dlYktpdC9ndGsvQ2hhbmdlTG9nIGIvV2ViS2l0L2d0ay9DaGFuZ2VMb2cK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</data>
<flag name="review"
          id="36444"
          type_id="1"
          status="+"
          setter="gustavo"
    />
    <flag name="commit-queue"
          id="40587"
          type_id="3"
          status="-"
          setter="laszlo.gombos"
    />
          </attachment>
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>