24703 2009-03-19 14:27:21 -0700 Support snapping, ticks for <input type="range"> 2013-03-28 01:36:55 -0700 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit Forms 528+ (Nightly build) PC All RESOLVED FIXED InRadar P2 Normal --- 27450 27451 19264 1 pkasting webkit-unassigned cmarcelo hyatt ian jonlee michelangelo mike ravi.kasibhatla tkent webkit-bug-importer webmaster oldest_to_newest 114373 0 pkasting 2009-03-19 14:27:21 -0700 <input type="range" min="1" max="3" step="1"> draws as an unmarked slider that slides smoothly from one end to the other. It would be nicer to have tickmarks and to snap to them. Try using Opera for a sample experience. 114374 1 28763 pkasting 2009-03-19 14:27:46 -0700 Created attachment 28763 Testcase 115608 2 pkasting 2009-03-27 14:40:02 -0700 Hixie says: Draw tickmarks as given in list="". If no list="", draw them for step="", unless step has been set to "any". Hyatt says: 115609 3 pkasting 2009-03-27 14:40:58 -0700 Bah, didn't mean to submit that yet. Anyway, Hyatt says: Don't want ticks by default. Perhaps also no ticks for step=1. 115615 4 pkasting 2009-03-27 14:59:46 -0700 My proposal: Do what Hixie says, but also don't draw tickmarks if we don't have enough room. Assuming 1-px ticks, you'd need 2n + 1 pixels or more. If the theme only goes down to k-px ticks, we'd probably want k(2n + 1) free pixels; below that, no tickmarks + no snapping. Hopefully, this avoids breaking too many existing Mac widgets that don't want tickmarks, e.g. the Safari RSS widget, because they'd fail the 2n + 1 test. 462864 5 webkit-bug-importer 2011-09-06 14:41:32 -0700 <rdar://problem/10081072> 483137 6 ravi.kasibhatla 2011-10-13 05:22:09 -0700 Is this issue still valid? If yes, I would like to propose a patch for the same. 483321 7 pkasting 2011-10-13 11:05:12 -0700 (In reply to comment #6) > Is this issue still valid? It's not closed and no one has commented otherwise, so assume yes. 483733 8 tkent 2011-10-13 19:47:21 -0700 (In reply to comment #6) > Is this issue still valid? If yes, I would like to propose a patch for the same. Yes. I think Comment #2 to #4 are reasonable. 865252 9 tkent 2013-03-28 01:36:55 -0700 This was done as <datalist> support. 28763 2009-03-19 14:27:46 -0700 2009-03-19 14:27:46 -0700 Testcase foo.html text/html 72 pkasting PGZvcm0+ClJhbmdlOiA8aW5wdXQgdHlwZT0icmFuZ2UiIG1pbj0iMSIgbWF4PSIzIiBzdGVwPSIx Ij48YnI+CjwvZm9ybT4K