187761 2018-07-18 07:43:01 -0700 [GTK] http/tests/security/contentSecurityPolicy/1.1/plugintypes-affects-child.html is flaky 2020-08-17 06:36:35 -0700 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit WebKitGTK WebKit Nightly Build Unspecified Unspecified RESOLVED INVALID P2 Normal --- 1 aboya webkit-unassigned bugs-noreply cgarcia mcatanzaro oldest_to_newest 1442994 0 aboya 2018-07-18 07:43:01 -0700 The following test fails on GTK since r233910: http/tests/security/contentSecurityPolicy/1.1/plugintypes-affects-child.html --- /home/slave/webkitgtk/gtk-linux-64-release-tests/build/layout-test-results/http/tests/security/contentSecurityPolicy/1.1/plugintypes-affects-child-expected.txt +++ /home/slave/webkitgtk/gtk-linux-64-release-tests/build/layout-test-results/http/tests/security/contentSecurityPolicy/1.1/plugintypes-affects-child-actual.txt @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ -CONSOLE MESSAGE: Refused to load http://127.0.0.1:8000/plugins/resources/mock-plugin.pl because its MIME type does not appear in the plugin-types directive of the Content Security Policy. This tests that a plugin-types directive on a top-level page should be inherited by a PluginDocument embedded in the page. This test passes if a console error says that the plugin was blocked. 1443013 1 aboya 2018-07-18 08:43:43 -0700 Regressed by: [Nicosia] Add debug border, repaint counter state tracking to Nicosia::CompositionLayer https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187749 1443016 2 aboya 2018-07-18 08:50:04 -0700 Actually, no. That patch is completely unrelated; it just happens that it's the first failing commit, but that's because the bots discard all previous successful builds. 1443021 3 mcatanzaro 2018-07-18 09:08:36 -0700 (In reply to Alicia Boya García from comment #0) > The following test fails on GTK since r233910: I see that's the only test failure in recent history. r233912 was successful. I think the test is flaky and should be marked accordingly. I think you got tricked because r233910-r233911 was the most recent test run at the time you filed the bug. In these cases, it's important to look at the commit in question and guess if it is likely to blame, since it's often the case that the test is flaky and will pass again on the next run (as was the case here). 1443033 4 aboya 2018-07-18 09:52:21 -0700 (In reply to Michael Catanzaro from comment #3) > (In reply to Alicia Boya García from comment #0) > > The following test fails on GTK since r233910: > > I see that's the only test failure in recent history. r233912 was > successful. I think the test is flaky and should be marked accordingly. Yeah... by the time I downloaded results there were 2 failures in a row, but now it's Pass-Failure-Failure. 1680779 5 cgarcia 2020-08-17 06:36:35 -0700 Plugins are no longer supported.