15975 2007-11-13 17:34:11 -0800 REGRESSION: rcov 0.8 CSS highlighting is broken in Safari 3 2011-02-04 18:23:05 -0800 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit DOM 523.x (Safari 3) Mac OS X 10.5 RESOLVED WONTFIX http://taw.chaosforge.org/magic_xml/coverage/magic_xml_rb.html HasReduction, InRadar, Regression P1 Normal --- 41115 1 luis webkit-unassigned abarth ap emacemac7 mitz mrowe oldest_to_newest 61136 0 luis 2007-11-13 17:34:11 -0800 I reported this originally on http://www.luisdelarosa.com/2007/11/10/ruby-bugs-on-leopard/ rcov is a code coverage tool for ruby. Its latest version is 0.8.0.2. The output will highlight covered lines of code in green and uncovered in red. This worked perfectly in Tiger with Safari 2. However, in Leopard with Safari 3, it no longer highlights. I also tested with OmniWeb 5.6 and it does not highlight either. However, Firefox 2 on Leopard does work properly as does Camino on Leopard. One good URL that shows the information is http://taw.chaosforge.org/magic_xml/coverage/magic_xml_rb.html Rcov 0.4 however works properly in Safari 3 on Leopard and here's an example URL: http://bioruby-doc.org/coverage/-tmp-bioruby-lib-bio-db-gff_rb.html If you look at the difference, it looks like there are some extra XHTML tags that are of the form "<a name="line1" />" which throw off Safari 3. Also I tested a WebKit nightly, but I don't remember the version - I will test again soon but it was broken as well. 61151 1 17255 mrowe 2007-11-13 19:24:19 -0800 Created attachment 17255 Reduced test case 61152 2 mrowe 2007-11-13 19:31:17 -0800 http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/ does a good job of showing the difference here between Firefox and Safari. For the following snippet: <span><a/>Span One</span> <span><a/>Span Two</span> In Safari, the DOM is equivalent to the DOM given by: <span><a>Span One</a></span> <a> <span></span></a><a>Span Two </a> While in Firefox, the DOM is equivalent to that given by: <span><a>Span One</a></span> <span><a>Span Two</a></span> 61153 3 mrowe 2007-11-13 19:31:54 -0800 <rdar://problem/5599013> 61202 4 mitz 2007-11-14 07:55:47 -0800 What does libhtml5 say? 61227 5 ap 2007-11-14 12:34:11 -0800 Looks like it agrees with WebKit: <http://james.html5.org/parsetree.html>. MSIE builds a very different tree however. 296936 6 ap 2010-10-20 12:31:05 -0700 This problem still occurs in Safari 5 and nightlies. Adam, do we want to track this as an HTML5 parser compatibility issue? 296951 7 abarth 2010-10-20 13:04:56 -0700 > Adam, do we want to track this as an HTML5 parser compatibility issue? Sure. 345983 8 abarth 2011-02-04 18:23:05 -0800 I'm sorry, but I don't think we're going to fix this site. The site is now broken in Firefox 4 as well. It looks like a cool tool though. 17255 2007-11-13 19:24:19 -0800 2007-11-13 19:24:19 -0800 Reduced test case bug-15975-test.html text/html 223 mrowe PHN0eWxlIHR5cGU9InRleHQvY3NzIj4KICAgIHNwYW4gewogICAgICAgIGNvbG9yOiB3aGl0ZTsK ICAgIH0KICAgIGEgewogICAgICAgIGJhY2tncm91bmQtY29sb3I6ICM5OTk7CiAgICAgICAgcGFk ZGluZzogNXB4OwogICAgICAgIGZvbnQ6IDE1cHggc2Fucy1zZXJpZjsKICAgIH0KPC9zdHlsZT4K PHNwYW4+PGEvPlNwYW4gT25lPC9zcGFuPgo8c3Bhbj48YS8+U3BhbiBUd288L3NwYW4+Cg==