12198 2007-01-10 08:31:01 -0800 execcommand italic and bold commands should generate <i> and <b> 2007-04-25 12:37:05 -0700 1 1 1 Unclassified WebKit DOM 420+ PC OS X 10.4 RESOLVED INVALID P2 Normal --- 0 annevk webkit-unassigned ap oldest_to_newest 35897 0 annevk 2007-01-10 08:31:01 -0800 I heard that currently "italic" and "bold" generic something along the lines of: <span style="font-style:italic"> ... </span> that's not really useful. Given that this is mostly used by WYSIWYG editors generating <em> and <strong> isn't particularly useful either (that's what IE does at the moment). 20571 1 dpopa 2007-03-05 01:38:45 -0800 (In reply to comment #0) > I heard that currently "italic" and "bold" generic something along the lines > of: > > <span style="font-style:italic"> ... </span> > > that's not really useful. Given that this is mostly used by WYSIWYG editors > generating <em> and <strong> isn't particularly useful either (that's what IE > does at the moment). > Consider implementing document.execCommand("styleWithCSS", false, bool) as in Gecko. When bool is false, formatting commands should use tags instead of styled spans. Use B,I no STRONG,EM. 20572 2 dpopa 2007-03-05 01:48:49 -0800 OK, Use STRONG,EM not B,I . 12659 3 14175 ap 2007-04-25 06:26:20 -0700 Created attachment 14175 test case Anne, this seems to work as expected in a current nightly: <i><b>Test</b></i> I do not know if this has changed, or was always so. 12469 4 ap 2007-04-25 12:37:05 -0700 I've also tried r18386 (from December 2006), and it also added <b> and <i>. Closing as INVALID. Going to file a separate bug for styleWithCSS. 14175 2007-04-25 06:26:20 -0700 2007-04-25 06:26:20 -0700 test case italic.html text/html 211 ap PGRpdiBpZD0iZm9vIiBjb250ZW50ZWRpdGFibGU+VGVzdDwvZGl2Pgo8c2NyaXB0Pgpkb2N1bWVu dC5nZXRFbGVtZW50QnlJZCgiZm9vIikuZm9jdXMoKTsKZG9jdW1lbnQuZXhlY0NvbW1hbmQoIml0 YWxpYyIpOwpkb2N1bWVudC5leGVjQ29tbWFuZCgiYm9sZCIpOwphbGVydChkb2N1bWVudC5nZXRF bGVtZW50QnlJZCgiZm9vIikuaW5uZXJIVE1MKTsKPC9zY3JpcHQ+Cg==